We see the World a little differently

News

News

Litigation

[05/09] ArcelorMittal sues Esmark over aborted steel mill sale
[05/09] Government asks court to block wider testing for mad cow
[05/08] Oil companies agree to settle MTBE contamination lawsuits
[05/08] Dan Rather files amended lawsuit against CBS over his firing
[05/07] Mich. high court says gay partners can't get health benefits
[05/07] More than $11.5M awarded to Florida residents in citrus case
[05/07] Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling wins privacy case appeal
[05/07] `Crocodile Hunter' widow settles lawsuit with debt collector

More...

Case Summaries

Probate Trusts

[05/06] Estate of Coll-Monge v. Inner Peace Movement
In an action for trademark infringement and related claims, summary judgment for defendants-non-profits is reversed in part and remanded where: 1) the district court erred in holding that a non-profit corporation cannot be a related company whose use of the trademark is controlled by the mark's registrant; and 2) there remain disputed issues of fact regarding both the doctrine's applicability in this case, and the capacity in which testator registered the marks with the USPTO.

[03/31] Akira Akazawa v. Link New Tech. Int'l, Inc.
In a patent dispute, summary judgment for defendant based on lack of standing is vacated where issues of Japanese intestacy law must be resolved by the district court in order to determine whether plaintiff owned the patent at issue, and therefore possessed standing to bring the present suit.

[03/27] Estate of McDaniel
In an intestacy situation where a husband deceased before the effective date of a stipulated judgment dissolving the marital partnership, the trial court properly found that the wife was not entitled to an intestate share as a "surviving spouse" within the meaning of section 78 of the Probate Code because she was by the time of decedent's death "a party to a valid proceeding concluded by an order purporting to terminate all marital rights" within the meaning of 78(d).

[03/27] Estate of Claeyssens
In a case involving estate or inheritance tax, an order denying an executrix's petition to refund fees imposed pursuant to Government Code sections 26827 and 68087 is reversed as: 1) to the extent that these statutes authorize the fee, they were enacted in violation of the state constitution and are of no force or effect; and 2) Proposition 6 (Rev. and Tax. Code section 13301), coupled with article II section 10 of California Constitution provide that the Legislature alone may not impose an estate or inheritance tax.

[03/13] In the Matter of the Accounting by Fleet Bank
Relying on strong policy considerations that applied in Matter of Best, 66 N.Y.2d 151 (1985), the Court of Appeals finds that a child adopted out of a family by strangers does not share in the proceeds of class gifts to the biological parent's issue created by 1926 and 1963 irrevocable trusts.

[03/04] Anthony v. US
A decision finding that a non-transferrable private annuity must be valued, for estate tax purposes, in accordance with certain tables set out in the Internal Revenue Code is affirmed where the case presented no applicable exception to valuation of the relevant annuities by use of the tables.

[03/03] Ranger v. Ranger
In a complaint for construction requesting the court construe various parts of the subject trust agreement, granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant regarding the disposition of the deceased's business is reversed and the matter remanded where summary judgment for defendant was inappropriate as the directive containing the disposition would not take effect until after the surviving trustor's death.

[02/26] In re Estate of Yucis
In the matter of obtaining restitution for theft from an estate, order of the probate court that convicted thief's fiance should give thief's personal property to the sheriff for sale and allowing fiance to go forward with the sale of real estate in which thief may have a contractual interest is reversed and the matter remanded where the probate court committed a clear error of law by entering the order.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.


Lansdale Office
ACTS Center-Blue Bell
375 Morris Road, P.O. Box 1479
Lansdale, PA 19446-0773
Phone: 215.661.0400
Fax: 215.661.0315
E-mail Us
Directions

Perkasie Office
210 West Walnut Street
P.O. Box 259
Perkasie, PA 18944-0259
Phone: 215.257.3666
Fax: 215.453.0892
E-mail Us
Directions

Allentown Office
609 Hamilton Mall
Allentown, PA 18101
Phone: 610.433.5850
E-mail Us
Directions

Limerick Office
296 W. Ridge Pike, Suite 204
Limerick, PA 19468
Phone: 1.800.99LEGAL
Fax: 215.661.0315
E-mail Us
Directions


FirmSite® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.

Our lawyers serve businesses, individuals, and municipalities in eastern Pennsylvania, including Philadelphia, Allentown, Lansdale, Perkasie, Limerick, Blue Bell, Ambler, Jenkintown, North Wales, Skippack, Montgomeryville, Kulpsville, Doylestown, and Norristown. We also serve clients in Bucks County, Montgomery County, Chester County, Delaware County, Philadelphia County, Monroe County, Northampton County, Lehigh County, Berks County, and Lancaster County.