Finding Balance in Advocacy: The Art of Zen in the Courtroom

HRMM&L Attorney Steven Barrett’s latest article, The Art of Zen in the Courtroom, recently published in The Trial Lawyer’s Journal, explores a powerful yet often overlooked dimension of trial advocacy—the balance between control and letting go.

In the courtroom, attorneys are trained to prepare meticulously, anticipate every argument, and maintain command of the narrative. Control is essential. But as Barrett explains, the most effective advocates understand that success is not built on control alone. It also requires adaptability, awareness, and the ability to respond to the unexpected with clarity and composure.

Drawing on principles rooted in mindfulness and Zen philosophy, Barrett examines how trial lawyers can cultivate a heightened sense of presence—remaining grounded in the moment rather than overly attached to rigid plans or outcomes. This mindset allows attorneys to listen more deeply, think more clearly, and adjust their strategy in real time as the dynamics of a case evolve.

At its core, The Art of Zen in the Courtroom challenges the traditional notion that strength in advocacy comes solely from control. Instead, Barrett suggests that true effectiveness lies in the interplay between preparation and flexibility—knowing when to assert direction and when to allow the case to unfold naturally.

For trial lawyers, this balance can lead to more authentic communication, stronger connections with juries, and ultimately, more persuasive advocacy.

Barrett’s article offers practical insights for attorneys at every stage of their career, encouraging a more thoughtful and dynamic approach to litigation—one that integrates discipline with awareness and intention with openness.

READ FULL ARTICLE

Next
Next

Steven Hann Presents on the Municipality Authorities Act